Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

International Journal of Law And Collaboration (IJLAC) applies a rigorous peer-review process to maintain academic quality and integrity.

Stage 1 – Submission
The manuscript is submitted through the journal's official submission system.
Stage 2 – Initial Editorial Screening
The editorial team evaluates the manuscript for:
  • Scope and relevance
  • Originality
  • Basic academic quality
  • Compliance with Author Guidelines
  • Ethical considerations
  • Plagiarism/similarity concerns
  • Completeness of submission documents
Manuscripts that do not meet the basic requirements may be returned to the authors before peer review.
Stage 3 – Reviewer Selection
Manuscripts that pass initial screening are assigned to qualified reviewers with relevant expertise. IJLAC recommends a double-blind peer-review model, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other.
Stage 4 – Peer Review
Reviewers assess manuscripts based on criteria including:
Originality
Research significance
Theoretical contribution
Methodological rigor
Legal reasoning and analysis
Quality of evidence
Relevance of references
Clarity of presentation
Ethical compliance
Contribution to the field
Reviewers are expected to provide constructive, objective, confidential, and evidence-based comments.
Stage 5 – Editorial Decision
Possible editorial decisions include:
  • Accept
  • Accept with Minor Revisions
  • Revise and Resubmit / Major Revisions
  • Reject
*A manuscript may require more than one round of review.
Stage 6 – Revision
Authors must respond carefully to reviewer comments and provide a clear response-to-reviewers document when requested.
Stage 7 – Final Acceptance
After satisfactory revision, the Editor-in-Chief or designated editor makes the final publication decision.
Stage 8 – Copyediting and Proofreading
Accepted manuscripts undergo editorial and production processes before publication. Authors may be asked to review the final proofs and correct typographical or factual errors.
Reviewer Confidentiality
  • Reviewers must treat submitted manuscripts as confidential documents.
  • Reviewers must not use, share, reproduce, or disclose unpublished information contained in manuscripts.
  • Reviewers should also declare conflicts of interest and decline assignments where impartiality cannot be maintained. These confidentiality principles are consistent with established scholarly publishing recommendations.
Peer Review Process — International Journal of Law And Collaboration (IJLAC)